Why modern art sux; defending the "bland" mona lisa

Posted under /ipol/

Ill seperate into two categories
Internet and physical art
Internet art is notorious for being cringe (see devianart)
I have an explanation as to why
I was watching whatifalthist explain mysticism (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ-DDL2HG6w)
and it clicked.
--------------
Ever since descartes mind/body separation made it so that "artist" preoccupy their drawings on the fictitious, the never expanding corners of ones mind, thats why we see zany furry ocs and artist humor
Modern art on the other hand is too commited to the body, thats why it is all zany theatrics, like the banana taped on the wall
-----------------
The Mona Lisa kinda perfects it as its a drawing of a (real) cute girl. The body isnt hyper exaggerated like an anime or inflated nor is it blank like a colorless mannequin. So body and mind are not dualistic but monistic
Thoughts?

I had an epiphany when I encountered DA gooner artist #80085 a few months back that they have a seriously deteriorated concept of their ideal human figure to the point where they can only see blobs of white. It might be a good way to diagnose brain disorders/injuries (likely just debilitating Asperger's) by having them describe their specialized Aphantasia present in their "art." There might be a spiritual reason why modern art is such a shell of its former self, but it is compacted with various other stages of terrible acts against it that needs to be studied more in-depth to be separated and properly dealt with.

My Comment from Then:

I have a working theory that all off-model fetish sludge online is the endless struggle of the horde to achieve popularity and, therefore, a sturdy shield to protect oneself and anyone linked to them from any critical eye. The pocket crank pervert fandumb may gush over the EPIC portrayals of Nikocadoian proportions before you, but no fetish "artist" cares about any character they post online, as their bug brain's only love is the hyper-specific target of their sexual delight. In this case, it's extreme curves. If there was zero pressure to flood the Internet with as much "differentiating" "art" as possible to set up a nest egg of commissions and orbiters, you would see nothing but plain white, indescribable globs of flesh and fat in slightly rotating spots depending on the baby gravytrain goblinoid you encounter. This is how they see ALL their "art," from the moment of conception to the very end of the post's lifespan (a few minutes). This contrast between "artist" and "art" is what leads far too many of this category to drool out illicit pornographic material, as they cannot stray from the gooner flow state to see anything other than the aforementioned white globs.

I only feel contempt when I am recommended this dogshit after making the apparent mistake of reporting child porn that shares the same algorithmic metatags as yours. Have a terrible day and life if I never see anything from you again.

TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:

I had an epiphany when I encountered DA gooner artist #80085 a few months back that they have a seriously deteriorated concept of their ideal human figure to the point where they can only see blobs of white. It might be a good way to diagnose brain disorders/injuries (likely just debilitating Asperger's) by having them describe their specialized Aphantasia present in their "art." There might be a spiritual reason why modern art is such a shell of its former self, but it is compacted with various other stages of terrible acts against it that needs to be studied more in-depth to be separated and properly dealt with.

My Comment from Then:

True

TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:

I had an epiphany when I encountered DA gooner artist #80085 a few months back that they have a seriously deteriorated concept of their ideal human figure to the point where they can only see blobs of white. It might be a good way to diagnose brain disorders/injuries (likely just debilitating Asperger's) by having them describe their specialized Aphantasia present in their "art." There might be a spiritual reason why modern art is such a shell of its former self, but it is compacted with various other stages of terrible acts against it that needs to be studied more in-depth to be separated and properly dealt with.

My Comment from Then:

Nigga
Did u know
Ppl with aphantasia
Have an avg iq of 115?

Bill said:

Nigga
Did u know
Ppl with aphantasia
Have an avg iq of 115?

No I did not. But considering that 115 is seemingly the end of the world's IQ average bell-curve before it drops off to the #realGs, I would not be surprised knowing that the average person generally doesn't have as vivid of an imagination as others. It's likely a different condition that I'm thinking of, since gooner artists are sub-90 at best.

TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:

No I did not. But considering that 115 is seemingly the end of the world's IQ average bell-curve before it drops off to the #realGs, I would not be surprised knowing that the average person generally doesn't have as vivid of an imagination as others. It's likely a different condition that I'm thinking of, since gooner artists are sub-90 at best.

Yes, true
Low functioning autism

1