Why I dont believe in "genocide"

Posted under /ipol/

Firstly its a liberal neology a la social darwinism and capitalism, so Its a spook created not only for thought control but mind manipulation towards bloated empathy. I said previously that we are cells that maintain a bigger body- a country. A country is ran top->bottom. "Genocide" is usually a top ->bottom chain, you see it with the elites who pushed the "holocaust" the Wasps who initiated "the trail of tears", Or Jews (Not a fan of Israel) killin Palestinians. You can rationalize these "genocides" within my framework.
1. Jews are an ethnic group originating from Egypt who would put their interests first over germans (Reminder the jews utilized the press to ostracize richard wagner) therefore dont belong in Germany. Its also wrong to think of Nazi-Jewish relations as pure bloodlust. Let it be of note that the Havaara agreement made it so 20-25% of jews living in germany got out safely, so I think itd be unfair to characterize the germans as wanting to kill all jews like how we are taught in classrooms.. It should also be noted racial scientist Hans F K Guenther (Who Hitler loved) met Arthur Ruppin where the former positioned that Zionism was a rational solution and that jews and germans were "distinct but equal"
2. Wasps wanted to move more wasps (cells) into native land
3. Jews want to establish a safe state in the Levant. Palestinians pose a threat to that. Naturally theyd want them gone... You can also reverse this for the Palestinian cause.
I believe "genocides" arise from a mostly rational reaction but its today oh so demonized because we are hurled the last man lifestyle where we arent cells inside countries, but countries confined of cells. We are all thought that a country can simply just mantain its self via "individualism" and thu we walk with no direction and only question why others arent walking without directions as well.. thoughts?

-------
(Some material I left unfinished as I have concluded this genocide is so fake its not worth adressing lool)
3. Kongo is an extension of Belgium, but first off the 20m (Reminder this very liberal number came from a post ww2 90s lib book, so imagine the accuracy) (edit this is what AI said when I asked for how many people died in the Kongo: though modern demographic research suggests a decline of slightly over 1 million including emigration and reduced birth rates.)

Updated

TwnkH8er said:

Depends

If youre reffering to white people well, I wouldnt classify it as genocide but "ethnic migration". Like how birds can fly into the borderless skies so do orientals into the first world. This is of course impractical since it breaksdown holistic communties but unlike the foreign jews, unlucky natives, and war torn Palestinians (this could be as well), I think its reversable.. time will tell.. framing it as a genocide sets up an inferiority complex which is kinda cringe

Bill said:

If youre reffering to white people well, I wouldnt classify it as genocide but "ethnic migration". Like how birds can fly into the borderless skies so do orientals into the first world. This is of course impractical since it breaksdown holistic communties but unlike the foreign jews, unlucky natives, and war torn Palestinians (this could be as well), I think its reversable.. time will tell.. framing it as a genocide sets up an inferiority complex which is kinda cringe

My solution would be
1. Cut welfare
2. Arrest the people who are giving illegals jobs
3. Enforce Naftaish stuff (Since cheap work will always have to be necessary) you can attract cheap labour while not seeing them.. just dont make it globalist like Nafta with an eventual two continent governmsnt
5. Repeal civil rights
4. Incalculate via education future generations into the realities of race and idk maybe people will part ways peacefully

1