https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/quitgivingthemattention.html
Will our website be deemed hostile today (removed from the wiki and all the joys thereafter) due to (((outsider))) meddling? Lets find out!
Updated by TwnkH8er
Posted under /swa/
This topic has been locked.
https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/quitgivingthemattention.html
Will our website be deemed hostile today (removed from the wiki and all the joys thereafter) due to (((outsider))) meddling? Lets find out!
Updated by TwnkH8er
Bill said:
https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/15283530.html
Will our website be deemed hostile today (removed from the wiki and all the joys thereafter) due to (((outsider))) meddling? Lets find out!
I did not find the joke in the image funny but it is quite obvious it’s just edgy for the sake of being edgy and it’s nothing more than a joke
NiggazWithAttitude said:
I did not find the joke in the image funny but it is quite obvious it’s just edgy for the sake of being edgy and it’s nothing more than a joke
Yeah it isn't the usually diddyblud "joke" of "saar I want to have sex sexy sex wit loli child saar i am faking epstein senor o algo".
xXD4NKM3M3L0V3R2005Xx said:
Are we the next Sherdee boogyman?
Associating the site with the ‘sphere puts us at greater risk of becoming an enemy splinter, because it causes the site to become a safe haven for banned soyteens. We have already had many incidents of this, and it’s becoming a problem. Obviously we shouldn’t ban soyjaks but maybe there should be a moratorium on posts about Soyosphere drama
Sectionalism said:
Associating the site with the ‘sphere puts us at greater risk of becoming an enemy splinter, because it causes the site to become a safe haven for banned soyteens. We have already had many incidents of this, and it’s becoming a problem. Obviously we shouldn’t ban soyjaks but maybe there should be a moratorium on posts about Soyosphere drama
This...
I opined on this to Petrixxx to make it so that each page could on maximum only have 5 soyjak posts (out of 20) but he said no
Sectionalism said:
Associating the site with the ‘sphere puts us at greater risk of becoming an enemy splinter, because it causes the site to become a safe haven for banned soyteens. We have already had many incidents of this, and it’s becoming a problem. Obviously we shouldn’t ban soyjaks but maybe there should be a moratorium on posts about Soyosphere drama
We need an immigration policy of integration and filtration, ie. promoting the use of Rage Comics instead of Soyjaks, educating newCHADS on iFunny kulchur, etc.
It's extremely likely that one of our many active detractors created that thread. Given that the GIFcaption was made before 'eff and overall pedophilia reached the point it is now on iF, it's really brown to assume that it's anything other than offensive for offensive's sake (which was very common in the early days to bait moral outrage comments out of autists to farm jek-worthy slapfights).
TeeThingus_Bonemantics said:
It's extremely likely that one of our many active detractors created that thread. Given that the GIFcaption was made before 'eff and overall pedophilia reached the point it is now on iF, it's really brown to assume that it's anything other than offensive for offensive's sake (which was very common in the early days to bait moral outrage comments out of autists to farm jek-worthy slapfights).
Who are our detractors though