Furry porn is just a watered down version of zoophilia. Furry porn (known as "yiff" by furfags), HMOFA (human male on female anthro), and even porn of neko girls (anime girls with ears and tails from animals) are all zoophilic in nature.
Sexual attraction to neko girls is zoophilic becuase, to the gooner, the animal ears and tail "enhance" the sexual appeal of the anime girl, meaning they find animal features erotic, finding animal features erotic is zoophilia, the same can be applied to anthro furries since they are like nekos but with an even bigger focus on animal features.
furry porn = zoophilia
Posted under /faun/
TitanTVMan said:
Furry porn is just a watered down version of zoophilia. Furry porn (known as "yiff" by furfags), HMOFA (human male on female anthro), and even porn of neko girls (anime girls with ears and tails from animals) are all zoophilic in nature.
Sexual attraction to neko girls is zoophilic becuase, to the gooner, the animal ears and tail "enhance" the sexual appeal of the anime girl, meaning they find animal features erotic, finding animal features erotic is zoophilia, the same can be applied to anthro furries since they are like nekos but with an even bigger focus on animal features.
Saying Furry Porn isn't Zoophilia is like saying Lolicon isn't Pedo because it's a heckin' drawerino, Also Titan did you know that polls show that most of the Furries actually either have indifference or Aversion to Human porn? Furcacas are so deranged that they don't find their own species attractive anymore,i feel bad for thinking that furries are cool in the past and thinking of becoming one...
6gazillionbraps said:
Saying Furry Porn isn't Zoophilia is like saying Lolicon isn't Pedo because it's a heckin' drawerino, Also Titan did you know that polls show that most of the Furries actually either have indifference or Aversion to Human porn? Furcacas are so deranged that they don't find their own species attractive anymore,i feel bad for thinking that furries are cool in the past and thinking of becoming one...
The fact that furries are only turned on by humans if the humans in question are mixed with animal features is solid proof that furryism is zoophilic in nature.
Water is wet btw
KeKino said:
Water is wet btw
Is this the real ToonSoy
Sectionalism said:
Is this the real ToonSoy
Yes
KeKino said:
Yes
Were you on ifunny?
Never made an account but I did lurked there since the early 2020s
"feral" (actual animals) is so much worse to the point the line is actually blurred
No wonder those that have digitigrade feet and animal genitalia disgust me more (plantigrade feet and humanoid genitalia is gemmy in comparison, but still coal doe).
Some designs can be cool even if nude as long as sexual intercourse (what makes it porn) is completely thrown out the window. Too bad all their designs are sexualized (hyper muscles/boobs/asses/dicks, suggestive expressions) or downright ugly (THE COLORS!!!!!!!)
Another thing that ruins it is the fact that the fandom is INNATELY sexual.
Updated
OPShredder said:
Some designs can be cool even if nude as long as sexual intercourse (what makes it porn) is completely thrown out the window.
The furry fandom lowkey had so much potential but porn destroyed it all. On the topic of "even if nude", it should be noted that our favorite cartoon animals (Tom and Jerry, Daffy Duck, ect...) don't wear clothing, becuase they're animals.
1