Against warrior castes

Posted under /ipol/

Do I even have to explain why? Drone warfare will kill any chance of there being a revival of a warrior caste, as how can this ever be noble? How many drone kills you have?
Q. What should replace it?
A. I recommend you read this utopian book: Francis Bacon's New Atlantis, in which the hierarchy is based on their scientific contribution
Salomons house: A highly esteemed scientific/academic instution. Acts as the most important administrative building
Scientists: Inventors, Engineers, Researches all congregate in the house and decide how the technology is used
Messengers: international travelers that observe tech from other countries (stalin already kinda did this with nukes)
Naturalists: Tasked with inventing new medicine, tools, and agricultural practices
Ordinary citizens: tied up into religion, though this book was in 1627, and since then we have lots of insight surrounding the follies of some religions, I propose a form , see "Gottgläubig" and in which its morals are built on pragmatability.

Others reasons why I despise warrior culture and revere drone warfare. "The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of millions is a statistic" - Unknown. I believe its barbarism to kill 1-20 people by yourself and getting others to revere you because youre good at being a killer.... the deaths of millions via drone warfare is more humane, doesnt put any killer on a pedastle since its a group effort by thousands, and is again, just a statistic, nothing personal, nothing more.
Thoughts?

1. Anti-drone stuff. Tanks, planes, battleships, and nukes didn't make infantry obsolete either, although they certainly made war lamer. The russo-ukrainian war would be devoid of men in combat otherwise
2. I unironically believe that sword fighting tournaments and medieval warfare between certain groups should be revived as a way to take power or as a legal method of settling disputes. It would be a legal thing, and usage of cheat weapons like drones could be punishable by death, and it would also force elites to fight for their continued power and existence. Traditional combat in general would usurp commerce as the most effective means of rising to power, as the strong should protect the weak
3. Scientists and strategians would be forced to figure out how to minimize the amount of automation in war at the risk of their loved ones' lives. This could take an extremely long time and cost billions of dollars, but honor is worth every second and every penny

1