Genuine question: why is Epstien posting permitted but not scully posting? Not trying to be a smartass, I wanna know the reason.
Well, scully is more niche and the jokes surrounding him are made by a select few and thus has more... interesting connotations Epstein on the otherhand is more normified I mean, its on your insta fyp after all
Genuine question: why is Epstien posting permitted but not scully posting? Not trying to be a smartass, I wanna know the reason.
A lot of pedobraps on iF co-opted Scullyposting years ago to shout to the heavens how much they love children. It was beyond over when someone (I'm thinking Colaws' group for some reason, but can't remember if it was that or if I'm crossing wires with the Cuties Incident) posted a screencap of a bunch of iFers in a 'cord call "watching" Daisy's Destruction. Epsteinposting is looking to be a similar situation that's unfolding in real time on other platforms, where there's a split between irony and swarths idolizing him, wanting to be him. It's obvious right now who is which, but once it reaches the point where the irony is poisoned or pushed out for unironic pedophilia, then we'll no longer permit it.
