Why I prefer soft hereditary over hard hereditary

Posted under /ipol/

What is the difference between the two you might ask?
Hard: King dies -> son replaces
Soft: King dies -> son has to prove himself against generals and what now but has influence by his king
Soft: -> see george h w bush and george w bush
Soft hereditary ensures a progeny will have to deal with his biological progenitors legacy wheter it be good or bad and could keep potentially bad rulers out of power
Thoughts?

1