Why I am a Deist

Posted under /ipol/

I have finally come to terms with my faith
Deism comes from the word Deus which comes from the Roman word for God, ergo belief in a God
IE see the term "DEUS VULT"
As for why I don't believe in these organized religions comes down to
Abrahamic religions
1. It prioritizes superstition over reason, IE see when the catholic church started prosecuting Galileo because of heliocentrism
2. Prayers -though useful- is just a placebo
3. They are not static; you think a religion sent from God would never be subject to splintering and constant flux (See the sunni vs shia divide for instance) and we'd have one clear interpretation from these abrahamic religions
4. The parables: How can Joshua prolong the day? How can the Muslims (forgot which one) ride a flying elephant? and how can you come back from the dead? It is obvious God created the world with natural laws that cant be broken, without any exceptions
5. I do not think original sin exists, and like Rousseau, were all born good but corrupted by outside influence
6.How are jews the chosen people in your books and at the same time open to repeated 24/7 persecution by the same groups?
Other assorted religions/atheisms
Paganism: All plain larp from gods people dont believe in, but some of the aesthetics are nice
Buddhism: I dont believe in asceticism, and since we only have one life, it looks foolish to spend it all on trying to restrict our desires
And reincarnation obviously does not exist as we are born with a wiped memory "a blank state" so you think wed be given what we did wrong to ascend to higher realms
Atheism/Agnosticism: Birrins wise words "what was here was once not here therefore was created"

I will end it with an excerpt from Thomas Jefferson

"I hold (without appeal to revelation) that when we take a view of the Universe, in it’s parts general or particular, it is impossible for the human mind not to percieve and feel a conviction of design, consummate skill, and indefinite power in every atom of it’s composition. the movements of the heavenly bodies, so exactly held in their course by the balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces, the structure of our earth itself, with it’s distribution of lands, waters and atmosphere, animal and vegetable bodies, examined in all their minutest particles, insects mere atoms of life, yet as perfectly organised as man or mammoth, the mineral substances, their generation and uses, it is impossible, I say, for the human mind not to believe that there is not, in all this, design, cause and effect, up to an ultimate cause, a fabricator of all things from matter and motion, their preserver and regulator while permitted to exist in their present forms, and their regenerator into new and other forms. we see, too, evident proofs of the necessity of a superintending power to maintain the Universe in it’s course and order. stars, well known, have disappeared, new ones have come into view, comets, in their incalculable courses, may run foul of suns and planets and require renovation under other laws; certain races of animals are become extinct; and were there no restoring power, all existences might extinguish successively, one by one, untill all should be reduced to a shapeless chaos. so irresistible are these evidences of an intelligent and powerful Agent that, of the infinite numbers of men who have existed thro’ all time, they have believed, in the proportion of a million at least to Unit, in the hypothesis of an eternal pre-existence of a creator, rather than in that of a self-existent Universe"

Thoughts? Opinions? Disagree? Agree?

Updated

Also I am not the most religiously educated, but 4 is a poor argument. God has infinite power and can break rules we cannot because we are his creations. Think of how royalty is traditionally above the law

PETRIXXX said:

Also I am not the most religiously educated, but 4 is a poor argument. God has infinite power and can break rules we cannot because we are his creations. Think of how royalty is traditionally above the law

Why would God create his own rules just to break them to help some semites (who have a record for hallucination) in the desert? Why he never did that in India or China? and How do you qualify which supernatural events are legitimate? Are Mormonisms supernatural events just as real as the ones described in Islam?
As for your second argument, Carl Schmitt does talk about it. Types of Government mold their system of thinking based of off their religion so IE if you have an interventionist God you get an interventionist government, if you have an noninterventionist God ie (This all traces back to China/Deism) Capitalism originated from Francois Quesnay (who coined laissez faire) who was called the "Confucius of Europe" (who Voltaire calls Confucius the ultimate deist) who was also been reported to be heavily inspired from Taoist We Wei (which translates to non intervention). Just look at the early US like Jefferson who was a non interventionist and non coincidentally a Deist. So I do not believe your take is rational as its just one types of people applying a hue of what they think of as God. I do thought believe in enlightened despots and intervention if they harass you (both countries are subversives), but on the economy I believe in non intervention as Adam smiths invisible hand analogy points, the market usually corrects itself

1